🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogTrade this market →

ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon

How the prediction markets are pricing "ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon" — Polymarket mid plus comparison with Betfair and Manifold.

ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon 100% Completed Match 100% ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Total Sets: O/U 2.5 100% ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 1 Winner 100% Volume: $243K Closes: 15 Aug 2026
Open live market →
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket (via Oscar Predictions 2026) Pick
polygram.ink (preferred broker)
100% 0% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle Trade this market →
Polymarket (direct)
polymarket.com
100% 0% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain Trade this market →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD Trade this market →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR Trade this market →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) Trade this market →

Outcome probabilities

Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.

OutcomeProbability
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon100%
Completed Match100%
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Total Sets: O/U 2.5100%
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 1 Winner100%
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 2 O/U 8.5100%
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 1 O/U 8.5100%
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Match O/U 21.5100%
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 2 O/U 9.5100%
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 1 O/U 9.5100%
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Match O/U 22.5100%
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 1 O/U 10.5100%
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Match O/U 23.5100%
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 2 Winner0%
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set Handicap +/-1.50%
ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 2 O/U 10.50%

Market context

The match in question is a women’s ITF W35 semi-final in Chacabuco between Giorgia Pedone and Lucciana Perez Alarcon, a pairing that has been priced as close to a coin flip on the tennis markets. Live and pre-match listings show Pedone around WTA No. 338 and Perez Alarcon around No. 341, which helps explain why the crowd has not split the contest cleanly despite Pedone’s crowd-implied probability sitting at 100% YES in this market[1][2][4][12]. Both players have recent clay-court results in Argentina, so the setting favours form on the surface rather than reputation alone[12][16][18].

The useful precedent is that prediction markets on tightly matched tennis ties often move on small pieces of information rather than broad narratives: draw position, whether a player is listed for the scheduled start, and any live score or official update that confirms the match is under way. Similar markets in sport also show how public sentiment can diverge from a more mechanical event-status read; in tennis, once a match has started, settlement usually depends on who advances rather than pre-match expectation, while walkovers or cancellations can force a different outcome depending on the rules of the specific market[9]. TennisExplorer’s pre-match pricing and SofaScore’s live schedule both indicate a narrow contest with no head-to-head record available, which leaves traders with limited historical guidance[5][18].

For traders, the main catalysts are not stylistic but administrative: the official order of play, whether the semi-final is actually started, and whether any delay pushes it beyond the settlement window. Multiple live listings place the match on 8 August with varying local start times, while live score pages show the fixture either underway or queued for immediate play, so confirmation of completion matters more than the pre-match label[2][3][10][13][14]. Perez Alarcon has already logged routine straight-set wins earlier in the week, while Pedone’s path has also been strong enough to reach the last four, so any late withdrawal, postponement, or walkover would matter more than marginal ranking differences[12][16][20].

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Entertainment-specific comparison page for ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon. Polymarket's live quote (Polygon order book) shows the award probability. For awards markets, Polymarket usually has the deepest liquidity; Betfair runs comparable markets for Oscars/Emmys; Manifold for Eurovision.

Resolution & payout

Entertainment markets settle on official award ceremony or show end. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle with a source URL to the official award website. Two-hour dispute window, then smart-contract payout in USDC.

FAQ

How accurate are award predictions?
Variable. Industry-predictable awards (Oscar Best Picture) have high market accuracy (Brier ~0.15). Reality-TV outcomes with small markets carry more noise. Eurovision is notorious for market upsets due to bloc voting.
What was the top Oscar 2025 market?
Best Picture, with ~$2.8M volume on Polymarket. "Anora" started as an underdog at ~8% and closed at ~62% before the ceremony — the biggest single Oscar market swing since 2019.
Who can trade Eurovision markets?
Polymarket is globally accessible but geo-blocked in select jurisdictions — traders there use broker frontends with a different geo footprint to reach the order book. Eurovision markets have strong European liquidity; German/Austrian/Swiss flow often drives consensus.
How are reality-TV outcomes verified?
UMA Oracle uses the official show website or producer statement as the resolution source. Very narrowly defined markets (e.g. "Will X be voted off the island?") rely on the official show notes.
Is entertainment trading worth the effort?
Niche, but lucrative for experts. Award markets have fewer informed traders than political markets; combining industry expertise (film, music) with active research often surfaces mispricings. Volume cap: large bets move the market.
and

Trade ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon on Oscar Predictions 2026

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Open live market →

Related Topics

Tennis Prediction Markets