Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Oscar Predictions 2026) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
99% | 1% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
99% | 1% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Spread -0.5 | 99% |
| Spread -1.5 | 99% |
| Spread -2.5 | 99% |
| Spread -3.5 | 99% |
| Spread -4.5 | 99% |
| Spread -5.5 | 99% |
| Spread -6.5 | 99% |
| Rutgers O/U 23.5 | 97% |
| Spread -7.5 | 96% |
| Spread -8.5 | 96% |
| Spread -10.5 | 95% |
| Spread -13.5 | 95% |
| Spread -14.5 | 94% |
| Spread -16.5 | 93% |
| Spread -17.5 | 93% |
| O/U 35.5 | 93% |
| O/U 37.5 | 93% |
| O/U 39.5 | 90% |
| Spread -20.5 | 88% |
| Rutgers O/U 26.5 | 88% |
| O/U 41.5 | 85% |
| O/U 43.5 | 85% |
| O/U 45.5 | 80% |
| 2Q O/U 13.5 | 75% |
| O/U 47.5 | 73% |
| O/U 49.5 | 73% |
| 1Q O/U 13.5 | 70% |
| 1H O/U 21.5 | 69% |
| O/U 51.5 | 67% |
| 4Q O/U 13.5 | 66% |
| 1H O/U 27.5 | 64% |
| O/U 53.5 | 60% |
| O/U 55.5 | 55% |
| 3Q O/U 13.5 | 53% |
| 2H O/U 21.5 | 51% |
| 2H O/U 24.5 | 51% |
| 2H O/U 27.5 | 51% |
| 2H O/U 30.5 | 51% |
| 2H O/U 33.5 | 51% |
| 1Q O/U 7.5 | 51% |
| 1Q O/U 16.5 | 51% |
| 1Q O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| 2Q O/U 7.5 | 51% |
| 2Q O/U 10.5 | 51% |
| 2Q O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| 3Q O/U 7.5 | 51% |
| 3Q O/U 10.5 | 51% |
| 4Q O/U 7.5 | 51% |
| 4Q O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| Howard O/U 26.5 | 51% |
| Howard O/U 32.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers O/U 29.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers O/U 32.5 | 51% |
| Howard 2H O/U 11.5 | 51% |
| Howard 2H O/U 13.5 | 51% |
| Howard 2H O/U 15.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 2H O/U 12.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 2H O/U 14.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 2H O/U 16.5 | 51% |
| 2H Moneyline | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q1 | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 51% |
| Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 51% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 51% |
| Howard 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Howard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Howard Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 51% |
| Howard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 51% |
| Spread -17.5 | 50% |
| Spread -8.5 | 50% |
| Spread -6.5 | 50% |
| Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| Spread -4.5 | 50% |
| Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| O/U 57.5 | 50% |
| 1H O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| 1H O/U 33.5 | 50% |
| 1Q O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers O/U 35.5 | 50% |
| Howard 1H O/U 11.5 | 50% |
| Howard 1H O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| Howard 1H O/U 15.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers 1H O/U 12.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers 1H O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers 1H O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q2 | 50% |
| Game Goes to Overtime | 50% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 7.5 | 50% |
| Pick-Six Scored | 50% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 50% |
| Howard Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 50% |
| Howard 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Howard Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 50% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| O/U 59.5 | 43% |
| O/U 61.5 | 40% |
| O/U 63.5 | 32% |
| 1H O/U 30.5 | 32% |
| O/U 67.5 | 27% |
| O/U 65.5 | 26% |
| O/U 69.5 | 20% |
| O/U 71.5 | 14% |
| O/U 73.5 | 14% |
| Howard O/U 29.5 | 12% |
| O/U 75.5 | 10% |
| Howard O/U 20.5 | 5% |
| Howard O/U 23.5 | 4% |
| Spread -16.5 | 3% |
| Spread -14.5 | 3% |
| Spread -10.5 | 3% |
| Spread -7.5 | 3% |
| Spread -2.5 | 3% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers | 2% |
| Spread -20.5 | 2% |
| Spread -13.5 | 2% |
| Spread -1.5 | 2% |
| Spread -0.5 | 2% |
Market context
Market consensus: 99% chance of howard vs. rutgers. Prediction markets aggregate real capital to produce this probability signal. In the upcoming college football game between Howard and Rutgers, scheduled for September 25 at 7:00PM ET: This market will resolve to "Howard" if Howard win the game. This market …
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $125K.
Methodology
Entertainment-specific comparison page for Howard vs. Rutgers. Polymarket's live quote (Polygon order book) shows the award probability. For awards markets, Polymarket usually has the deepest liquidity; Betfair runs comparable markets for Oscars/Emmys; Manifold for Eurovision.
Resolution & payout
Entertainment markets settle on official award ceremony or show end. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle with a source URL to the official award website. Two-hour dispute window, then smart-contract payout in USDC.
FAQ
- Which entertainment markets are available?
- Oscars / Academy Awards (Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor/Actress), Eurovision Song Contest, Emmy Awards, Grammy Awards, Golden Globes, plus reality-TV outcomes (Bachelor, Survivor). Volume usually sits in the five- to six-figure range per market.
- How accurate are award predictions?
- Variable. Industry-predictable awards (Oscar Best Picture) have high market accuracy (Brier ~0.15). Reality-TV outcomes with small markets carry more noise. Eurovision is notorious for market upsets due to bloc voting.
- What was the top Oscar 2025 market?
- Best Picture, with ~$2.8M volume on Polymarket. "Anora" started as an underdog at ~8% and closed at ~62% before the ceremony — the biggest single Oscar market swing since 2019.
- How are reality-TV outcomes verified?
- UMA Oracle uses the official show website or producer statement as the resolution source. Very narrowly defined markets (e.g. "Will X be voted off the island?") rely on the official show notes.
- Is entertainment trading worth the effort?
- Niche, but lucrative for experts. Award markets have fewer informed traders than political markets; combining industry expertise (film, music) with active research often surfaces mispricings. Volume cap: large bets move the market.
Trade Howard vs. Rutgers on Oscar Predictions 2026
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →